Many Americans have found out exactly what ObamaCare means for them, and they’re not happy. Sure, some will be able to obtain cheaper coverage, thanks to subsidies that hide the true cost of coverage. But too many people are getting stuck with sticker shock.
“My wife and I just got our updates from Kaiser telling us what our 2014 rates will be. Her monthly has been $168 this year, mine $150. We have a high deductible,” wrote Tirge Caps on his diary at Daily Kos, a leftist blog. “We are generally healthy people who don’t go to the doctor often. I barely ever go. The insurance is in case of a major catastrophe.”
“Well, now, because of Obamacare, my wife’s rate is [going] to $302 per month and mine is jumping to $284,” he continued. “I am canceling insurance for us and I am not paying any f**king penalty. What the hell kind of reform is this?”
“Oh, ok, if we qualify, we can get some government assistance. Great. So now I have to jump through another hoop to just chisel some of this off. And we don’t qualify, anyway, so what’s the point?” he asked. “I never felt too good about how this was passed and what it entailed, but I figured if it saved Americans money, I could go along with it.
“I don’t know what to think now. This appears, in my experience, to not be a reform for the people,” he added.
This reflects the feelings of many people, including some who were previously ObamaCare supporters. The San Jose Mercury News recently told the stories of two Californians, both of whom voted for President Obama, who are seeing premium increases because of ObamaCare.
Jon Stewart, host of Comedy Central’s The Daily Show, isn’t exactly known for carrying water for Republicans. But you wouldn’t have known that on Monday night when he sat down with Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to discuss ObamaCare.
During the nearly 11-minute interview, Stewart grilled Sebelius about the break big businesses have received and asked why individuals, especially those who may not want to participate in the law, aren’t getting the same treatment.
Stewart began the segment with a dig at the glitches that the health insurance websites have experienced since they were rolled out last week. “We’re gonna do a challenge,” he told Sebelius as he pulled out a laptop. “I’m gonna try and download every movie ever made and you’re gonna try sign-up for ObamaCare, and we’re gonna see which happens first.”
Sebelius began touting the exchanges, claiming that people will have a chance to compare insurance plans “[f]or the first time,” ignoring the fact that there have long-been websites, such as eSurance, that have allowed consumers to shop and compare and contrast between plans that fit their needs.
Whether they like it or not, congressional Republicans may have squandered their chance to deal on the debt ceiling because of the current government shutdown.
House Republicans are absolutely right when they say that President Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) have been unwilling to negotiate on a Continuing Resolution that would keep the government open. But they made a tactical political mistake by trying to defund and delay ObamaCare through a measure that would keep the federal government running.
Poll after poll shows that Americans disapprove of ObamaCare, the 2010 healthcare law, and they want it repealed. They’re seeing the effects of the law through higher insurance premiums and its effects on workers as many employers drop or change benefits, cut hours to avoid mandates and/or have scaled back plans to hire. Republicans have won the messaging battle on ObamaCare.
But early polls show Americans placing more blame on Republicans for the government shutdown than President Obama and Democrats. This isn’t entirely self-inflicted; after all, the media isn’t exactly doing them any favors by framing the narrative in a manner that helps the White House.
The federal government has shutdown for the first time in almost two decades as the House of Representatives and the Senate were unable to reach an agreement on a stop-gap spending measure to fund the government until mid-December.
It wasn’t for lack of trying. The Senate came into session around 2pm on Monday and rejected the Continuing Resolution (CR) passed by the House on Saturday night/Sunday morning. Senate Democrats opposed the measure because it would have delayed ObamaCare for a year.
Various Democratic senators explained from the floor that they had no intention of making changes to ObamaCare, insisting that their compromise was the spending levels by which the government would run. House Democrats said the same in their speeches in from the floor of the lower chamber.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) floated a one-week spending measure to give the chambers more time to workout their differences. But that idea was rejected by his counterpart, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV).
Breaking with President Barack Obama and Democratic leadership, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) said on Thursday that he would vote for a stop-gap spending measure that delayed ObamaCare’s individual mandate for one-year, citing the administration’s delay of the employer mandate:
“There’s no way I could not vote for it,” Manchin said at a Bloomberg Government breakfast today. “It’s very reasonable and sensible.”
Manchin, 66, said he’d be willing to delay the individual mandate as part of the budget negotiations because the Obama administration in July gave businesses an extra year to provide their workers with health insurance.
“Don’t put the mandate on the American public right now,” Manchin said. “Give them at least a year. If you know you couldn’t bring the corporate sector, you gave them a year, don’t you think it’d be fair?”
Chris Moody of Yahoo! News reports that Manchin will vote for the CR, including funding for ObamaCare, that Senate Democrats are expected to push through the chamber either today or tomorrow.
House Republicans are reportedly considering tacking on a one-year delay of the individual mandate to Continuing Resolution (CR) after the Senate returns the measure to the chamber. Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) confirmed on Thursday that it’s “unlikely” that he will accept a “clean” CR.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) failed to track millions of dollars in spending from an ObamaCare slush fund account, according to a report released on Wednesday by the agency’s watchdog, which will likely lead to fresh criticism for the agency as Congress further investigates its targeting of conservative groups and excessive spending.
The IRS has been given broad new powers to enforce various provisions of ObamaCare, including the unpopular individual mandate and the recently-delayed employer mandate. The Health Insurance Reform Implementation Fund (HIRIF), authorized by the so-called “Affordable Care Act” (ACA), provided the tax agency with $1 billion to implement and enforce the provisions.
The report released by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) found that the IRS didn’t track $67 million in expenditures from the HIRIF account, as required by federal law. The report notes that the IRS spent $488 million from the slush fund between FY 2010 and FY 2012.
“[TITGA] found that the IRS did not track all costs associated with implementation of the ACA including costs not charged to the HIRIF,” noted the agency watchdog in its report summary. “Specifically, the IRS did not account for or attempt to quantify approximately $67 million of indirect ACA costs incurred for Fiscal Years 2010 through 2012.”
The wheels are moving in the House of Representatives as they prepare for the Senate to send back the stop-gap spending measure to keep the government open. But House Republicans have indicated that they may include a one-year delay of the ObamaCare’s individual mandate, which would volley the Continuing Resolution (CR) back to the upper chamber with time on the clock running out:
The House Republican leadership is seriously considering attaching a one-year delay of Obamacare’s individual mandate to the Senate bill to avert a government shutdown, according to senior GOP aides.
If House Republicans decide to go this route, it would all but provoke a government shutdown, since Senate Democrats might not even schedule a vote on a bill that includes that provision, Senate leadership staffers say. Even if the Senate schedules a vote, there might not be time to move the legislation through the slow-moving chamber.
Several different tactics are under discussion within the top levels of House GOP leadership, and the path Republicans choose depends on several factors — chiefly the mood of rank-and-file Republicans when they return to Washington, and when the House gets the continuing resolution back from the Senate.
Yet another poll has been released showing opposition to ObamaCare at an all-time high, just two weeks before the law’s state health insurance exchanges are set to open.
Just last week, CNN released a poll showing that support for ObamaCare had fallen to a record low, with only 39% of Americans holding a favorable view of the law. The decline of support comes despite ramped up efforts by the Obama Administration to promote its various provisions.
But a new USA Today/Pew Research poll finds that 53% of Americans disapprove of ObamaCare, the highest number since they began tracking public sentiment of the law, while 42% approve of it. The poll also reflects a substantial intensity gap, showing that 41% strongly disapprove of ObamaCare, while only 26% strongly approve.
Public opposition to ObamaCare has remained high for some time, with most polls showing that Americans favor repeal. But the USA Today/Pew Research poll shows another interesting dynamic, with Americans trusting Republicans over Democrats on the healthcare issue, at 40/39, though the numbers are within the margin of error.
If a one-year delay of ObamaCare’s individual mandate were enacted by Congress and signed into law, it would reduce the federal budget deficit by $36 billion between 2014 and 2018, according to a report from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
In early July, the Obama Administration unilaterally delayed the employer mandate for one year, citing concerns from businesses that were not ready for the provision to take effect at the beginning of 2014. House Republicans struck a populist tone about the need to delay the individual mandate, with Speaker John Boehner telling reporters that it was a matter of fairness to American families.
“is it fair for the President to give American businesses an exemption from the health law’s mandates, without giving the same break to individuals and families across the country? Hell no it isn’t,” said Boehner during a July press conference, during which he announced that the House would vote on a measure to delay the individual mandate.
In mid-July, the House passed a delay of the individual mandate, the provision of ObamaCare that requires Americans to purchase health insurance or pay a punitive tax, and codified the delay of the employer mandate, over the objections of the White House.
But fairness isn’t the only argument for a delay of ObamaCare’s individual mandate. A report released last week by the CBO shows that there is a budgetary case for delaying the provision.
The Obama Administration has issued the final regulations for ObamaCare’s individual mandate. This controversial provision of the law, which goes into effect at the beginning of next year, requires most Americans to purchase health insurance coverage or face a punitive tax of $95 or 1% of their gross income.
Even as these regulations for the individual mandate are being implemented, Americans are weary of the provision and want it repealed or delayed, according to a recent tracking poll from The Morning Consult.
The poll, which was conducted at the end of July, found that 60% of registered voters oppose the individual mandate. It also shows that 49% want the individual mandate repealed while 28% believe it should be delayed. Only 39% support the provision and just 24% believe the provision should be implemented on schedule.
The Morning Consult also found that 57% of registered voters believe that ObamaCare will make healthcare more expensive for them through higher co-payments, premiums, and deductibles. Forty-one percent (41%) say that the law will make healthcare less expensive.