I can’t imagine the framers of the Constitution thought the simple wording of the 2nd Amendment would ever be brought into question.
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
You know that I don’t mince words and I don’t back down in fighting a federal government that has far exceeded the confines of our Constitution. I could use some help in the House, and that’s why I’m asking you to support my friend Tom McClintock.
You may remember when he stood up to the liberal Republican establishment in California and took on Arnold Schwarzenegger during the recall election in 2003. This guy will stand and fight, and we need him in the Congress. Tom has said that he expects our federal government to protect our borders and to preserve our individual freedoms as Americans. And beyond that, he wants it out of our pockets, away from our families and out of our faces. That’s my kind of candidate.
He’s facing the Daily Kos and DCCC fundraising machine, and he’ll need our financial help on his side.
While Americans should at all times continuously educate themselves about the founding of this nation, its founding fathers, and its founding documents, this is especially true during times of great uncertainty and inevitable political change. I think it would be safe to guess that Thomas Jefferson is the favorite revolutionary American philosopher and politician of a majority of United Liberty readers, so I have compiled some of my favorite Jefferson quotes-
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
Gone are the days of the old Republican Party- a party that supported the principles of less government, low spending, low taxes, the rule of law, and the United States Constitution. Nowadays, Republicans spend as much as Democrats, burdening future generations with inevitable tax hikes, and making our federal government larger and more powerful than one could have imagined possible just a few years ago.
The Supreme Court agreed yesterday to hear a case over Obamacare’s contraception mandate, a requirement on employers to provide health plans that cover emergency birth control, and its implications on religious liberty.
Hobby Lobby Stores, a craft chain with 578 stores and more than 13,000 employees, filed a lawsuit against the contraception mandate in September 2012, claiming that it violated the religious liberty of the owner and founder of the company, David Green, under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA).
Filings in the case — Sebelius v. Hobby Lobby Stores — explain that Green runs his business “with religious principles in mind” and points to the company’s mission statement, which commits to “[h]onoring the Lord in all we do by operating the company in a manner consistent with Biblical principles.”
The contraceptive mandate would include coverage for the morning after pill, Plan B and Ella, which Green believes is tantamount to abortion. Hobby Lobby claims that it could face fines of $475 million each year for non-compliance.
“If Hobby Lobby instead drops employee insurance altogether, it will face severe disruption to its business, significant competitive disadvantages in hiring and retaining employees, as well as penalties totaling $26 million per year,” said the brief filed by the company.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has come under intense scrutiny this year due to its targeting of the conservative and Tea Party organizations that were trying to apply for tax-exempt status. For many, that scandal highlighted the need to do away with the embattled agency and find a better, less privacy invasive way for the federal government to collect revenue.
Rep. Jim Bridenstine (R-OK) has taken up this cause. He has introduced H.J. Res. 104, a measure to repeal the 16th Amendment of the Constitution, which authorizes the federal government to levy and collect the income tax.
“Viable alternative plans for raising revenue fairly to support constitutionally enumerated functions of the federal government have been proposed. As long as the 16th Amendment is in place and lobbyists dominate Washington, these alternatives will never be considered,” said Bridenstine in a press release.
Bridenstine is a cosponsor to the Fair Tax Act, which would also repeal the 16th Amendment and eliminate the income tax. The “Fair Tax” would establish a 23% national retail sales tax. His office said that his 16th Amendment repeal measure also had support from activists who back the flat tax.
The Oklahoma Republican contends that the current tax system is too complex, unfair, and discourages entrepreneurial spirit of Americans and job creation. He also noted that the time needed for taxpayers to comply with the tax code is burdensome.
Organizations from varied political backgrounds have come together to launch a campaign that would tackle the NSA spying problem locally. The coalition led by the Tenth Amendment Center believes that the plan they have outlined and hope to get state legislators to support would ensure that the federal government’s efforts to collect phone, e-mail and other private digital data would be undermined.
The website OffNow.org was launched to give the public easy access to what the Tenth Amendment Center wishes to accomplish and how activists believe they can make it work.
According to the coalition, the piece of legislation they have written to be used as a model, the 4th Amendment Protection Act, would keep state and local governments from being required to help the National Security Agency to implement spying programs within their districts.
Local agencies would not be required to assist the NSA with the delivery of natural resources the facilities that run these programs require to function properly.
The idea came about when reports concerning Utah’s NSA data collection center using up to 1.7 million gallons of water per day made the news. While the state of Utah is the second driest state in the United States, it still provides a great amount of water to a facility run by the federal government to collect phone and Internet data, but does it have to?
As much as President Barack Obama and administration officials don’t want to admit it, the Constitution established three branches of government, all of which have clear and defined roles and are independent of each other, but needed to keep the others in check.
Over the last several decades, the lines between the executive and legislative branches have become increasingly blurred. Presidents have consumed more power and Congress, especially when its controlled by the party occupying the White House, have set idly by while it happens.
But since 2011, when Republicans took control of Congress, President Obama has frequently used this claimed power to create law by executive fiat and, at times, ignore laws passed by the members of a duly elected, equal branch of government. It has created a constitutional crisis.
The latest example of this is President Obama’s “administrative fix” to deal with millions of health plan cancellations caused by Obamacare. Without any constitutional authority to do so, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced, at his direction, that the government would not enforce grandfathered plan regulations for one year, leaving it up to insurers to decide whether or not to participate.
It’s no secret that Vince Vaughn was an outspoken supporter of Ron Paul’s 2012 presidential campaign. He introduced the Texas Republican at the 2011 Libertarian Political Action Convention (LPAC), noting that Paul’s philosophy is “consistent” and “rooted in the very foundation of America.”
Vaughn — who has starred in a number of films, including Swingers, Jurassic Park: The Lost World, The Wedding Crashers, and Dodgeball — offered a deeper glimpse into his political beliefs last week during a discussion with Adam Carolla.
Recounting a conversation the two previously had about politics, Carolla asked Vaughn if he considers himself to be a conservative.
“I do, yeah. I mean, I’m very supportive of Ron Paul, but I’ve always been, you know, more conservative than not,” Vaughn said, adding that his parents’ hardworking, self-reliant background helped shape his personal political views.
Carolla explained that he, too, identifies as a conservative, though he’s more libertarian on social policy. He asked Vaughn whether he took a similar angle on politics. His answer is more profound than what one would expect from many conservative politicians and talking heads.
“I think that what you come, as you get older, you just get less trust in the government running anything,” Vaughn told Carolla. “And that you start to realize when you really go back and look at the Constitution and the principles of liberty, the real purpose of government is to protect the individual’s right to, sort of, think and pursue what they have interest in.
As I sit before my keyboard today, mulling over the events of recent months and what they portend for America’s future, I find myself fighting a wave of discouragement. The foundation of what is good and great about America is not only being eroded, but is actively under attack.
After a two week long fight in which they were excoriated by Obama, Democrats, and their obedient lapdogs in the press as “hostage-takers,” “legislative arsonists,” and “terrorists” who negotiate “with a bomb strapped to their chests,” Republicans surrendered and agreed to a deal in which they got nothing they asked for, and gave Obama another trillion dollars in borrowing power, unimpeded implementation of Obamacare (including keeping in place an exemption from Obamacare for Obama himself, members of Congress and their staff, and special exemptions for the labor unions which have donated hundreds of millions of dollars to Democrats in recent elections).
It makes me weary to think about the suffering this nation faces now because of the decision to hand the reins of power to a man who despises the Constitution, who declared his intent to “fundamentally transform” our beloved America. It makes me wearier still to contemplate the increasing suffering we face with each passing day that we indulge our collective ignorance and apathy.
Do we truly think we can borrow a trillion dollars per year indefinitely? That we can allow a president to paint his political opponents as not just wrong on the issues, but as racist, hateful, and evil, and that it will not lead to levels of animosity that will incite violence? What kind of president declares half the citizens of his country to be evil? How can he possibly think he can make such blatant character assassinations and still be able to unite the people of this country?