The “Independence” of the Thoroughly Dependent: Modern Scotland’s Welfare Mentality and Proposed Succession in 2014
Scotland holds a very special place in my heart as it always does for anyone who has had the pleasure to travel there. My wife and I lived in Scotland while I was at the University of Glasgow, and our time spent amongst those charming, funny, witty, spirited people will never be forgotten. I still enjoy all things Scottish and look forward to my future visits to that amazing country. It is because of my admiration for both the Scottish people and succession movements in general that I have been closely watching the Scottish independence movement and am eagerly awaiting the upcoming referendum. I’d love to see a truly free Scotland loosened from the socialist, statist, bureaucratic chains of the United Kingdom. I get goosebumps at the very thought.
We all know the fighting spirit of William Wallace who proclaimed that the enemies of Scotland may take their lives but never their freedom. Statism and state-dependency have taken both from today’s Scotland. As shown on the Drudge Report this week, Mrs. Ruth Davidson of the Tory party recently got into hot water by drawing attention to the fact that nine out of ten Scottish households take more from the government than they pay in. In her words they are “living off of the patronage of the state.” This should shame those nine out of ten households, but it won’t. For the European lefty political class, there is no such thing as shame and they have passed this mentality onto their constituents.
This morning Citizen Journalist blogged (with video) about a Bay-Area meeting of Occupy types billed as “Hoodies and Hijabs.” Although commenters at this site and others attempt to distance themselves from any calls for destroying capitalism that come from these gatherings - stating that no one is a “leader” of Occupy and it’s a gathering of autonomous individuals - the message coming from these rallies, gatherings, protests (whatever you want to call them) - is remarkably cohesive.
- “Joyful violence against the state is the sanity to the everyday misery.” (Occupy Oakland)
- “An organization has to be built which can bring down capitalism.” (Occupy DC)
- “We need a revolution to overthrow capitalism and take society into a socialist direction.” (March on the RNC)
- “Fight Genocide, Destroy what is civilized.” (Occupy Oakland)
It is becoming ever more clear that the Occupy movement is cohesive and with a single goal of overthrowing capitalilsm.
Gene Healy, vice president of the libertarian Cato Institute in DC, is pretty much over politics:
I have a confession to make: Even though it’s my job to write about politics, I didn’t watch a single second of the Republican or Democratic conventions — not even a YouTube clip of Clint Eastwood talking to the chair.
I’ve long found electoral politics seedy and dispiriting, but that sensibility has lately become a debilitating affliction: like being a sportswriter struck by the unhelpful epiphany that it’s silly for a grown man to write about other grown men playing a game for kids.
These days, when I tune in to ABC’s “This Week” looking for a column topic, I can’t even make it past the first commercial break. Like Peter says to the management consultant in “Office Space,” “The thing is, Bob, it’s not that I’m lazy; it’s that I just don’t care.”
Politics makes us worse because “politics is the mindkiller,” as intelligence theorist Eliezer Yudkowsky puts it. “Evolutionary psychology produces strange echoes in time,” he writes, “as adaptations continue to execute long after they cease to maximize fitness.” We gorge ourselves sick on sugar and fat, and we indulge our tribal hard-wiring by picking a political “team” and denouncing the “enemy.”
What Healy is talking about is mostly elections and the actual governing process. He cites fellow Catoites Aaron Ross Powell and Trevor Burrus, who write in their Libertarianism.org essay “Politics Make Us Worse”:
(Image from Progressive Libertarianism)
Today is Labor Day, that holiday created in the 1880s to celebrate workers and blue-collar labor.As a youngster, I always found it quixotic, since doesn’t everyone labor somehow? It’s a holiday for everybody? But now I know what it really is about, and the new question I have is: Why not have a capital day?
With all the demonization of the 1% and industrialists in this day and age, it’s necessary to take a moment and remember just where we would be without capital: not very far. Foundation for Economic Education President Lawrence Reed explains it well:
Capital without labor means machines with no operators, or financial resources without the manpower to invest in. Labor without capital looks like Haiti or North Korea: plenty of people working but doing it with sticks instead of bulldozers, or starting a small enterprise with pocket change instead of a bank loan.
Capital can refer to either the tools of production or the funds that finance them. There may be no place in the world where there’s a shortage of labor but every inch of the planet is short of capital. There is no worker who couldn’t become more productive and better himself and society in the process if he had a more powerful labor-saving machine or a little more venture funding behind him. It ought to be abundantly clear that the vast improvement in standards of living over the past century is not explained by physical labor (we actually do less of that), but rather to the application of capital.
Look at that. That is meat. Juicy, delectable, delicious, wonderful meat. It is the cornerstone of our existence, the very foundation of our diets (no matter what that silly treehugger food pyramid says. I mean, it’s a pyramid. Clearly it wasn’t intended for Americans.) You get it from animals. It is animals. That tends to make folks like PETA mad (the other PETA, I mean, not the People for the Eating of Tasty Animals.) This is something we just can’t see eye to eye on.
See, a great guy named Peter Thiel—he got the very first Alumnus of the Year award from Students for Liberty this year—has decided to invest a ton of money in a new project that will create meat from a 3-D printer:
Billionaire Peter Thiel would like to introduce you to the other, other white meat. The investor’s philanthropic Thiel Foundation’s Breakout Labs is offering up a six-figure grant (between $250,00 and $350,000, though representatives wouldn’t say exactly) to a Missouri-based startup called Modern Meadow that is flipping 3-D bio-printing technology originally aimed at the regenerative medicine market into a means to produce 3-D printed meat.
Over at RealClearPolitics, Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner has just called opponents to the 2007-2008 bailouts as “knuckledraggers,” by saying that Paul Ryan—who did vote for TARP—is not one.
Did Boehner just have a Joe Biden moment?
We can take this a few ways. We can first take it that it was genuine, honest-to-goodness mistake, and never meant to say that. But we can also take it as a real “Kinsley Gaffe,” defined as: “when a politician tells the truth - some obvious truth he isn’t supposed to say.”
What is this obvious truth, then? It’s not all that obvious, but it is the truth: the Republicans are not at all committed to a free market system, and instead want to wallow and embrace crony capitalism. They love taking money from taxpayers and giving it to their friends and cronies who run major banks and industries, giving them preferential treatment in the laws they craft and unfair advantages in the marketplace.
Oh, and “we had to do it to save our economy”? Yeah right. Lehman Brothers, the fourth-largest investment bank in the nation four years ago, collapsed in September 2008. The end result? It’s leftovers got bought out by Barclays and Nomura, and nothing else happened. There was no disaster. So all of this is just cover for the truth: he likes to rewards cronies and punish enemies.
How free market is that?
As the debate over voter ID becomes demagogued by the left, LearnLiberty.org has a good video from Georgetown University Professor Jason Brennan about why economic freedoms should matter as much as the right to vote.
Being involved in a democratic process may be important, but the right to vote is not the same as giving someone control over his life. Without constitutional limitations which preserve our rights and liberty, efforts to expand voting participation almost always reduce personal autonomy.
You’ve heard about counties shutting down children’s lemonade stands for no other reason than county officials are, well, I can’t print what they are. But in Fauquier County, Virginia, officials have decided to top that…by punishing a woman who hosted a ten year old’s birthday party:
This is the idiocy that we have to deal with. This is the kind of heartbreak and torture created by government regulation. I bet you dollars to donuts that what happened here is a combination of misguided do-gooders who want to keep people from accidentally ingesting food that may not be edible, combined with larger farms and agricultural businesses who cackled evilly at the chance to create yet another piece of red tape to shut down competitors.
Great going, Fauquier. Ruining children’s birthday parties. You deserve some sort of award. Considering the subject matter, I think it should come in the form of a giant bucket of cow crud.
Video from my friend Sean Malone, aka The Logicologist, who works on the Economic Freedom Project.
With bold and often-controversial statements, Tea Party favorite Allen West has been a top target for Democrats nationally because of what he represents.
And if you thought egalitarian liberals were above good old-fashioned race baiting, then you should see this latest attack ad from The American Sunrise PAC:
According to The Shark Tank, the Super PAC was founded by the father of West’s opposition, Patrick Murphy. Thomas Murphy is the CEO of a construction firm, and gave $250,000 so far, which is an unimaginable number for a single donor in most congressional districts.
By showing West as a bully, he his hiting caucasion women IN THE FACE, while grabbing their money. Nevermind West is actually trying to end America’s fiscal recklessness while attempting to protect taxpayers’ dollars.
Politics is an ugly business, especially for conservatives who happen to be black.