WaPo Op-Ed Writer Exposes Problems With Government-Run Anything
Last Sunday the Washington Post ran an op-ed from Maggie Mahar, health care fellow for the left-wing think tank The Century Foundation. Her concern? That eventually a conservative Republican administration running a government health insurance option or, worse, a single-payer system, might shut off access to abortion, end-of-life care, birth control, or fertility treatments.
Mahar has, perhaps unwittingly, revealed the problem with having government run anything. Depending on government for anything means depending on whomever is running that government. Administrations, Cabinet secretaries, members of Congress (though not often enough), and budget priorities change. Too many people think only of the here and now when considering the greater implications of policies, but they should be thinking longer-term.
Before ceding any power to government (especially the federal government), just ask yourself one question: Would I trust my greatest political enemy with this power? There are some exceptions to this rule (only government can provide national security, raise a military, etc.), but consider longer-term implications to any policy being proposed. If you don’t trust Democrats with the power to use surveillance on the American people, then don’t give that power to a Republican administration and Congress. Likewise, if you don’t trust Republicans to run health care to your liking, don’t give a Democrat administration and Congress the power to run your health care.
Me? This is why I don’t trust government with, well, any of it. In the words of John Galt, leave me the hell alone!

United Liberty









Post new comment