Why I Choose to Remain With the Republican Party
It’s the one question I’m asked more than anything else: “Why do you stay with the Republican Party? You seem like more of a Libertarian to me.”
It’s a fair question, I suppose. There are a lot of issues where I don’t agree with many of my Republican friends: I think we should end the war on drugs; I think we should cut way back on the military aggression we show the world; I think government revenue should exceed government expenses; I think the federal government should be strictly limited to the powers expressly given to it in the Constitution.
There’s some common ground to be found with my fellow Republicans, for sure. And it’s those days that being a Republican is easy. When we’re on the same side of the talking points, it’s all good. But when we disagree, the name calling starts, the rumors start working their way through the rumor mill, and idiocy abounds. It’s those days I have to remind myself why I choose to remain in the Republican Party.
I have good friends in the Libertarian Party who offer constant reminders that they welcome my views of limited government and increased individual responsibility. When you look at the Libertarian platform, you’ll see that somebody like me lines up really well with the vast majority of a Libertarian’s beliefs about the role of government.
But even though I know I’d be welcomed enthusiastically into the Libertarian Party, and even though certain people who I used to think were friends have resorted to juvenile behavior when they disagree with me, I choose to remain in the company of these people. Here are a few reasons I have decided to stay with the GOP:
We have a two-party system. A lot of people say this like it’s a good thing. I disagree. It’s terrible that two groups of people have shared control of who gets to play the political game. The free market is a good thing, that competition makes all competitors better, and that competition will work just as well with political parties as it will with economic competitors. The problem, however, is that until the Democrats and Republicans truly embrace the free market, the inferior two-party system will remain, and working outside of that would be a disadvantage for me.
We have to choose our battles. Much like my Libertarian friends, I want to find good people to run for office so I can vote for someone of principle. The problem, however, is that while Republicans can actually fight that battle, Libertarians are left fighting the battle for access to the ballot. Here in Georgia, ballot access laws are some of the worst in the nation. While I respect (and support) the effort Libertarians put into fighting for ballot access, that’s not the battle I want to be fighting right now, so it makes more sense for me to stay in the Republican Party.
I want to be taken seriously. I hope my Libertarian friends will understand that I mean no disrespect on this point. The sad truth is that because voters are so brainwashed in the two-party mindset (and, yes, also because some Libertarians really are crazy), people who say they are Libertarians are often immediately dismissed from serious political discussion. I have found that people in the GOP will listen to what I have to say if I can get them to take me seriously. And I’m not convinced they will take me seriously with an “L” behind my name.
I believe change must come from within. There is a lot that needs to change in the Republican Party, and I believe effecting that change from outside the GOP will be impossible. Some tell me the Republican Party has passed the point of being salvaged. I’m not ready to accept that analysis. I still believe that the necessary change can come to the GOP, but that the much-needed change will have to come from within the party.
These are my reasons. I have some others, but these are the primary reasons I choose to stay with the GOP. Hopefully I can help be a part of a movement that takes the Party away from its liberal tendencies and toward the concept of individual freedom.
United Liberty








I agree with the analysis, but there’s no reason you can’t do the right thing in the privacy of the voting booth and fill in the circle for Libertarian candidates when the Republicans put up bad candidates.
Translation is in order.
When you say “less aggressive foreign policy,” what you really mean to say is “more girly-manish foreign policy,” or cowardness, or just downright surrendertarianism.
It’s funny how left-libertarians avoid using the more definitive terms, afraid to say what they really are.
Bottom line - if you advocate Ron Paul’s views on foreign policy, you’re a wimpy, cowering little girl. (Who 9 out of 10 times, you can rest assured never served a day in the US Military.)
I guess I’m the 1 of 10 who served in the military, as an Infantryman with the US Army who has helped police the streets of Baghdad, who disagrees with you, but a severely doubt it is 1 in 10 who side with me. If you supported our occupation of Iraq, it is likely that you weren’t there. We have lost so many young soldiers lives for what exactly? To protect us from WMDs? To help democracize nations that don’t want democracy? What about Afghanistan? It was their people who bread such hatred for those not like themselves that they attacked us. It was their people who harbored those who did attack us, and even encouraged them! Yet we are STILL THERE, rebuilding their nation because of the damage our rightful counter-attack left?
I dare you to call me a coward to my face. Believing that our military should be for, and only for, our defense is not cowardice. What is cowardice is calling others cowards because we believe differently than you. You are no better than those who harbored the terrorist that attacked us on 9/11!
Spoken like a true neo-con, Eric. When the money runs out what are gonna do with this Empire you are enthralled with?
If everyone took this defeatist attitude toward fixing the ballot access laws, the whole country would have Georgia-style ballot access laws. Don’t forget that Florida ballot access laws before 1999 were worse than the Georgia laws. But people in Florida fought, and fought, and fought, and in 1999 Florida abolished mandatory ballot access petitions entirely. That’s what activism can do when people don’t give up.
@Steve - you’re exactly right. While I’m not parting ways with the GOP, I most certainly am not voting straight ticket Republican.
To Mr. Davis… You want to be taken seriously, and you are a republican… Ummm… I think your political affiliation has killed that chance for you (and if that didn’t this blog has). I ask you this, what is the percentage of people who still fly the Republican flag? And the Democratic? People are leaving the two party system in mass because America is finely starting to wake up. If you want to try and revitalize a party that currently bases itself on fascist control, then I hope the best, but I think, like it did to the federalist party before it, its time for the republican party to die out and make way for the Libertarian Party…
PS: I love how you said that we are brainwashed into the two-party system, yet your first listed reason specifically enforces this brainwashing…
- Ron Paul has been in the Republican Party for over 20 years. Is the GOP any better off?
- Why continue to support a political party with a few good ones when you can support a political party which is a majority of good ones?
http://lptn.org/index.php/component/content/article/38-front/277-my-fina…
I’m an Independent and have always been. I honestly want to understand why anyone that isn’t wealthy would choose to be a Republican. I don’t mean to criticize your choice, I simply do not understand it.
I haven’t always had this belief. I voted for Regan and I’m proud of that choice to this day. The Republican party that exist now is something I don’t recognize. From the Paul Ryan bill to the idea to fight to discontinue the middle class tax cuts while supporting tax relief for the rich. How can they claim to be fiscally responsible when instituting tax cuts when at war with Iraq and running huge deficits? Recently they fought to defeat the creation of an independent Consumer Protection Agency,free from influence of special interests. Not to mention this insanity surrounding birth control, is this what we should be most concerned about with so many problems confronting this country? Calling for the elimination of the FDA, EPA, SEC, ect .I for one want to know that the food I eat, the drugs I take and the Companies handing my money I make are overseen by somebody. It would scare the hell out of me to think that corporations would go unchecked and that there only concern would be to constantly increase there bottom line. The gun debate is a non issue, Obama hasnt tried to institute amy major legislation to comtrol them. So what is it that the Republicans propose that would improve this country? Why should I vote for them?
Post new comment