The Importance of Being Ronald Ernest Paul
The disappointment is to be expected. Ron Paul supporters are emotionally, financially and physically invested in their candidate. Anything other than a decisive win is a disappointment. However, there is no rational reason to be down in the mouth or fatalistic.
The Iowa caucuses have proven that Ron Paul’s candidacy is one to be reckoned with. In every way, the establishment and old media have tried to tear down the man and his ideas only to be repudiated at every turn.
During caucus result coverage, Fox News trotted out every neoconservative hack available. Bill Kristol, Charles Krauthammer (does anyone notice he seems to have hired Micheal Jackson’s plastic surgeon?) and Karl Rove were put in front of cameras to explain that Ron Paul, whose campaign is fueled entirely by a grass-roots army, was not a serious candidate and “dangerous” to America.
Ironically, they were correct on one count. Ron Paul is dangerous to the Woodrow Wilson/Leon Trotsky communist wing of the Republican and Democrat establishment. Their attempt to cover up abject terror after considering their political and financial futures should a Ron Paul Presidency occur, was completely transparent.
If you watched any of the network coverage of the Caucuses, you would have seen that the whole body of establishment media hacks and ex-politicians in attendance attempted to treat Ron Paul as a pariah. Even Al Gore got into the act, claiming that ending the Federal Reserve was the kookiest idea ever and opining that a 20 year-old newsletter Paul didn’t write, which predicted the possibility of a race-war that Gore and his ilk have been trying to foment for decades, was something that needed further scrutiny.
But when the smoke cleared, Ron Paul emerged as a genuine “top tier” candidate with one of three tickets to the Republican nomination. His ideas won’t be marginalized and his supporters will not be deterred from supporting him with their lives, liberty and property.
The undeniable fact that the establishment now has to report, to maintain any credibility, is that Ron Paul is a formidable candidate.
In fact, going into the New Hampshire primaries, Ron Paul has established himself as the most serious candidate in the race. Promoting ideas that have been ridiculed and obfuscated for decades, his star is rising and after 30 years of public action, these crucial ideas are now being seriously discussed and debated.
None of his rivals, including the sitting President, want to debate these ideas. But as Ron Paul has pointed out (paraphrasing Victor Hugo), “An idea whose time has come cannot be stopped by any army or any government”.
Ron Paul’s candidacy represents a real and serious vehicle to save hundreds of thousands of lives in the US and abroad. Real humans will face death and imprisonment unless the policies and direction of what has become a tyrannical juggernaut, can be reversed.
The reason Ron Paul is so exciting to a growing number of people worldwide is that he is genuinely reaching their hearts. Where tyrants have for so many years enacted laws by appealing to the compassionate nature of their constituents, the people are recognizing in themselves and in Ron Paul what true compassion means. This is what has the establishment so terrorized and what has caused them to step up their efforts to snuff out what is left of the guarantees on freedom in the Constitution.
Iowa proved once and for all that there is a significant and serious opposition to the direction we have been headed.
There have always been compassionate, thoughtful people in the United States but they have rarely had any representative in government matching their compassion. Many politicians have talked about compassion, but their laws haven’t resulted in anything remotely resembling it. The number of voters who have seen through such sophistry can be directly attributed to the actions of one politician who not only preached it, but lived and voted it. In doing so, he taught us what compassion means in terms of political action. The importance of being Ronald Ernest Paul can never be understated.
It is precisely because of Ron Paul’s consistent, principled example that young and old are flocking to his aid. What makes him so dangerous to the establishment and so loved by his supporters is that he cannot be bought. Even after 30 years in Congress, the lobbyists know that they can find no comfort or solace in his office.
And this is also precisely why his supporters, even after feeling a bit bruised after the Iowa Caucuses, have no reason whatsoever to wear long faces. They will pick up their banners and march with him right into the Republican National Convention in the face of all odds. Odds which now, very conspicuously, are turning in their favor.
United Liberty








The real results from Iowa, the delegate counts, haven’t come in yet. The Presidential preference vote was a beauty contest. Why else would no one contest an eight vote margin?
Well the delegates won’t be selected until June. Personally I think that there could be quite a surprise as the other candidates did not have the activists to volunteer and become county delegates. Will be fun to watch.
Hey, why did RP send people to die in Afghanistan? Just want to know.
And why does he continue to lie that he was drafted? No one was drafted into the AF.
Because he thought that Bush was telling the truth when he said he only planned on seeking out those who committed the attacks on 9/11.
What’s your source for claiming nobody was drafted into the AF?
Also, why did the “real conservative” RP need to bring in ringers from the Democratic, Green, and independent camps to beat a “liberal” like Santorum?
Ringers? They flocked to him because his policy of peace and liberty appeal to them. I guess you must really not like Reagan that much. Ever noticed how many democrats and independents voted for him in 1980 and 1984?
How do you think the Republicans can beat Obama if they can’t appeal to democrats and independents?
Great article, Rick!
I have been extra energized lately by the attacks on Ron Paul supporters. I take it very personally, because I had these beliefs before I even knew Ron Paul existed. The latest attacks have focused on claiming that Dr. Paul and his supporters are not “conservatives” or “republicans” as if we have no business participating in the political system.
I have never been one to label myself, politically or otherwise anyway, but I am angry at the attitude the Republican Party has towards Dr. Paul and his supporters.
Anyway - sorry for the long comment, but I expressed this because I am wondering if you have any suggestions for keeping this momentum going even after the elections (should Ron Paul not win - I still want to participate in this change). I feel that Dr. Paul’s presence has provided a focal point for those of us that support liberty, personal responsibility and peace. Any suggestions on how to continue that after November?
P.S. - LOL @ the comment on Krauthammer - I have noticed that!!! HAHA!! :)
I think we have to take over the Republican party with our own people. So at the state and county conventions the delegates are selected from those who stay after the primaries and seek to get elected as precinct delegates. We have to purge the party of the “old guard” who are belligerent to freedom.
join the RLC - Republican Liberty Caucus, and you will find yourselves at home: http://www.facebook.com/groups/RLCLAC/220901141326266/
Excellent article. When the principles of liberty, honor, and mutual respect are considered dangerous, and powermongering at home and abroad is the norm, it is time for a peaceful but relentless revolution! Ron Paul is the voice of millions who are conscious and will not be dictated to by the warfare/welfare state. It is much bigger than Ron Paul - the reason I love him so much is that he is in it for what he believes in - not for his own ego or power-seeking. That is what we who believe in and understand liberty share - we know that liberty is win/win and we do not need to dominate our neighbors to prosper. We do not benefit from plundering either through socialist policy or military intervention in the long run, but rather from peaceful mutual enrichment. Yes, we defend our rights without hesitation, but we do not aggress. Thanks Rick!
You are most welcome. Thank you for reading it :)
Paul is not believed by many when he says he didn’t exercise editorial control over the newsletter. New Republic and Stephen Glass anyone? The irony is that the original piece about Paul was written by James Kirchick in New Republic.
Post new comment