VIDEO: Free Trade vs. Protectionism

Welcome, Instapundit readers!

The folks over at Learn Liberty bring a new lesson from George Mason University economist Donald J. Boudreaux (who blogs at Cafe Hayek) on free trade and protectionism as matters of policy, and their impacts on wealth creation:

Protectionism today comes in the form of Buy American restrictions (which were reinforced in the so-called stimulus bill), whose proponents argue that forcing manufacturers to produce goods using inputs created by American firms, or that the government buy/contract goods and services solely from American firms through its procurement process, will help preserve and create jobs at home.

Of course, this couldn’t be further from the truth. See “Trading Up: How Expanding Trade Has Delivered Better Jobs and Higher Living Standards for American Workers” by Daniel Griswold, director of the Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies at the Cato Institute, for more analysis. The basic thrust of the free trade argument is that, under a free trade regime, foreign firms accumulate more wealth. As the standard of living rises abroad, and workers’ incomes rise (see “Two Trends in Global Poverty” by Laurence Chandy and Geoffrey Gertz at the Brookings Institution for empirical data), they in turn spend their incomes on American goods, providing incentives for American firms to hire to meet the new global demand.

I’m glad to see Professor Boudreaux mention Hong Kong in his video — that was a key focal point of Nobel laureate Milton Friedman’s 1980 multi-part documentary, “Free to Choose,” an incisive look at microeconomics and trade policy that arguably spurred some of the fastest global changes in policy (which resulted in wealth creation, particularly in Asia and Eastern Europe) that the world has ever seen.

Recently, Cato Institute senior fellow and economic historian Johan Norberg retraced Friedman’s footsteps in Hong Kong in the documentary “Free or Equal,” to see if the tenets of economic liberalization held true to this day. Unremarkably, they have:

Free or Equal recently aired on PBS — I watched it the other night, and was a well-spent hour of my time. If you haven’t seen it yet, click here for upcoming listings, or you can purchase the DVD edition here.

Free trade with free countries only.

RT's picture

Free trade policy is even more important with countries that aren’t yet free — as Milton Friedman (and later, Johan Norberg) correctly theorized, political freedom is birthed out of economic freedom. What happened politically in Eastern Europe and Asia in the 1980s was the direct result of economic liberalization, and the U.S. has benefited heavily from this.

“Free trade with free countries only” is a form of reverse protectionism that doesn’t benefit the U.S. at all.

stackiii's picture

The theory is flawed. Political freedom is birthed out of a cultural insistence on personal liberty. Eastern Europe and Asia also support that theory.

Mike Mahiney's picture

And when do cultures insist on personal liberty? When they’ve got skin in the game, which comes from economic liberty.

stackiii's picture

Too bad. It will not show at all here in the Peoples Republic of Madison.

Surrounded's picture

I see the ‘free trade with free countries’ or ‘free trade with humane countries’ all the time, and rarely if ever with actual data backing it up.

Free trade is the ability for two people to voluntarily exchange value without someone else interfering. Anything less is someone saying ‘i know better than you’ and keeping them from making their exchange.

I just don’t understand why protectionists feel so free to use coercion to force something they obviously don’t have the data to support. And it’s not just on the left, there are plenty on ‘our’ side that would gladly support anti-China restrictions, which are really anti-consumer restrictions.

Morgan's picture

If this is the rule for commercialism, then those who are in governance might become a beneficiary of this idea.

ipad case

erine's picture

Who’s benefiting from this free trade?

Shine's picture

Both parties to trade benefit from it.

stackiii's picture

I enjoyed reading it. I require to study more on this topic. Thanks for sharing a nice info..Any way I’m going to subscribe for your feed and I hope you post again soon.

Tony

Jakarta Hotel's picture

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <u> <p> <br> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <span> <img> <object> <embed> <param> <blockquote> <div> <table> <tr> <td> <tbody> <thead>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.

More information about formatting options

 

Twitter


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.