Democrats had hope that Lt. Gov. John Walsh (D-MT) would give them a shot at keeping control of a Senate seat that seems poised to be taken by Republicans later this year. But Harry Reid’s hand-picked candidate is facing questions over an alleged impropriety that occurred when he oversaw the Montana National Guard.
With Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT) slated to serve as President Barack Obama’s next Ambassador to China, it looked as though Walsh would get a boost in the race with an appointment to the Senate by Gov. Steve Bullock (D-MT). But the questions over Walsh’s behavior could set him back in what needs to be an error-free campaign.
The questions about Walsh stem from an August 2010 U.S. Army inspector general report which found that the then-adjutant general of the Montana National Guard had improperly used his office for “private gain.”
“The [inspector general] report says Walsh improperly solicited other Guard leaders to join a non-governmental group, the National Guard Association of the United States (NGAUS),” reported Helena-based KXLH-TV. “Walsh wanted to boost Montana Guard membership in that association because he was running for vice-chairman of the group.”
The report described Walsh’s emails to colleagues as “coercive” and that he had “improperly used government resources,” including his federally-issued computer, to send emails on behalf of NGAUS. The news outlet points out that one of his subordinates described Walsh’s conduct as “very threatening.”
Walsh’s campaign is trying to downplay the report, which is to be expected. John Fund of the National Review noted that Walsh was never punished or disciplined for the alleged impropriety. “Don’t be surprised if some of the National Guard troops who felt intimidated by Walsh appear in a TV commercial revisiting the issue,” Fund added.
The most recent survey in the race, conducted by Public Policy Polling in mid-November, found Rep. Steve Daines (R-MT), the likely Republican nominee, holding a 17-point lead over Walsh. Political analysts have given Republicans a slight advantage in a race that could determine control of the Senate.