New study details EPA’s regulatory incompetence


During a speech last month at Georgetown University, President Barack Obama outlined new anti-consumer environmental regulations that he planned to implement by executive order through the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

This executive-level agency, a creation of then-President Richard Nixon, has long been a thorn in the side of energy consumers, property owners, and businesses by enacting regulations often with little to no congressional oversight or pursing legal action to please the anti-capitalist, radical environmental Left. And while he is relying the agency to implement his new agenda, President Obama apparently isn’t aware of just how incompetent the EPA is.

A new study authored by William Yeatman of the Competitive Enterprise Institute shows that the EPA is six years behind its regulatory responsibilities to implement three major parts of the Clean Air Act.

“Since 1993, 98 percent of EPA regulations (196 out of 200) pursuant to these programs were promulgated late, by an average of 5.68 years (or 2,072 days) after their respective statutorily defined deadlines,” wrote Yeatman in the study. “Currently, 65 percent of the EPA’s statutorily defined responsibilities (212 of 322 possible) are past due by an average of 5.88 years (or 2,147 days).”

Yeatman notes that this matter for three different reason. First, it shows a tremendous measure of incompetence from an regulatory agency with an enormous amount of power — and there has been little in the way of accountability from Congress.

Secondly, Yeatman notes that the EPA has used its seemingly unchecked regulatory power to pursue a climate change agenda over implementing the Clean Air Act. So instead of carrying out the law as passed by Congress, the EPA has essentially become a legislature in and of itself.

Lastly, the study points out that the EPA has colluded with environmental organizations that file lawsuits against the agency to enact policy.

“Sweetheart lawsuits are enabling secret policy negotiations between unelected bureaucrats and environmental lawyers,” explained Yeatman. “If the EPA wants to give priority to its many outstanding responsibilities, it should do so in cooperation with the states, which have to actually implement these regulations, rather than the likes of environmental special interests like the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, or Center for Biological Diversity.”

This agency has allowed radical environmentalists who have no concern for the costs being passed onto state and local governments or consumers rather than adhering to mandates passed by Congress.

The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.