Father of Sandy Hook student defends Second Amendment

Bill Stevens

In the aftermath of the tragic shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, politicians at all levels of government are looking at stricter gun control measures; policies that they are foolish enough to believe will prevent similar incidents from occuring.

While President Obama has used children as a political prop in the debate, Bill Stevens, a resident of Newton whose daughter attends Sandy Hook, recently took on legislators in Connecticut who are seeking to expand gun control.

Stevens, who appeared before a Working Group Public Hearing on guns, explained that his daughter was “in lockdown” at Sandy Hook on the day of the shooting, noting that a sibling of her classmate was killed during the shooting. Stevens went over the meaning of the Second Amendment, quoting directly from the Constitution of Connecticut.

“We all know what the Second Amendment says, but Section 15 of the state Constitution says very clearly, ‘Every citizen has a right to bear arms in defense of himself and the state,’” noted Stevens. “There’s no registration, there’s no permitting, there’s no background checks. It’s quite clear.”

Noting that the legislature couldn’t restrict the constitutionally guaranteed, Stevens explained, “In order to limit the rights of individuals, there is something called due process, and legislation is not due process.”

“You want to take my rights away, let’s go to court,” proclaimed Stevens.

The important historical purpose and civil liberties points aside, Stevens also explained that the Second Amendment provides a tool to protect his family against those who would do the harm. “Criminals and tyrants, tyrants especially, beware, lockdown is not an option at the Stevens’ residence. And 9-1-1 will be dialed after the security of my home is established,” Stevens sharply noted. Echoing the famous words of Charlton Heston, Stevens added, “I will tell you here today, you will take my ability to protect my Victoria from my cold, dead hands.”

You can watch the full testimony below:

What they need to do is regulate these anti-depressant drugs that are handed out like candy. Most of these shooters were on these drugs. 100,000 of our soldiers are on them. 349 of them committed suicide last year. If anyone would bother to check the records of these soldiers, it would be interesting to see how many of them were on them. These drugs should only be prescribed by psychiatrists, not general practitioners, who would then be able to monitor their patients for signs of unwanted side effects including psychosis, paranoia, restlessness, hallucinations, suicidal or homicidal thoughts. Controlling these drugs would go a lot farther than banning guns to eliminate violent behavior. It’s this behavior that leads to killing.

Mark Howe's picture

You know nothing about medicine, so I don’t believe you are qualified to comment on anti-depressants.

Anonymous's picture

Sandy Hook will forever be etched in our history as one of the greatest and certainly the most senseless tragedies in America. Gun control issue is here again. - Scott T. Sohr

Amanda Cole's picture

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <u> <p> <br> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <span> <img> <object> <embed> <param> <blockquote> <div> <table> <tr> <td> <tbody> <thead>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.

More information about formatting options

 

Twitter


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.