Was Election Day a good day for liberty?

As I’ve made clear before I was a fan of neither major party Presidential candidate.  Both stood for big government, continued spending, interventionist foreign policy, and little respect for civil liberties.  So as Election Day approached, I was excited to cast my vote for Gary Johnson.  As far as actual policies go, he was the only candidate running who offered anything different than the status quo.

That being said, I won’t deny that, while I did not vote for him, I was pulling for Romney to win, simply because I don’t think Obama has the slightest clue how to handle the economy.  This fact alone was enough to make me at least flirt with the idea of voting for Mitt as I stood in line to cast my vote.  While I ended up voting Johnson, on Election Night I was quietly hoping that somehow Romney could pull it out.

But once it became clear that he would not, my focus shifted to various other races and ballot initiatives.  And for the most part, these turned out just like I had hoped.  Gay marriage was legalized in Maryland and Maine, and marijuana initiatives did very well.  Not everything turned out great, but it was exciting to see evidence that attitudes are changing on both of these topics.

Furthermore, hard-core social conservatism had a very bad day, which is good for anyone who hopes that segment of the GOP can be reduced in influence.  Michele Bachmann almost lost her election, and both Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock were defeated soundly after expressing extreme and offensive views on rape and abortion.  It looks as if Allen West was defeated as well.  All of these are good news if you want the GOP to jettison some of its more extreme members.

The election also saw the election or re-election of promising small-government candidates like Justin Amash, Ted Cruz, and Jeff Flake.  These folks will join a slowly growing number of limited government supporters in Congress.  The number is still small, but it is growing and looks like it will keep doing so.

And beyond this specific election, Romney’s trouncing revealed massive holes in the GOP strategy and, I believe, opened a great opportunity to move the party to more sane policies.  Conservatives are still licking their wounds but most now realize that the GOP is losing younger voters and minorities by large margins.  The days are long past where there were enough older white voters to still win elections.

So, while I am disappointed that we will have to deal with four more years of Obama, I think the news is, overall, quite good.  I felt for a while that Romney losing might be just what the GOP needed to get its act together, and I’m hoping that’s the case.  It doesn’t need to lose its base but it must expand in order to survive.  There are millions of voters who are open to a message of fiscal responsibility and social moderation.  In years to come, I hope we look at the 2012 election as the start of something good.

All in all, I think Election Day was good for liberty. The overall reality is that neither Obama nor Romney stood for real freedom or liberty. In the end, this means we have 4 years of Obama instead of a potential for 8 years of Romney’s virtually identical policy. That means 2016 can bring us real liberty-minded candidates instead of having to wait until 2020. While it’s unlikely either party will turn the corner, the GOP is at least the most likely possibility.

I was just talking a few days ago about the beautiful results with the religiously extreme elements of the GOP being voted against: http://www.lifelibertythepursuit.com/religious-extremism-takes-one-on-th… Maybe we can get social conservativeness out of fiscal conservativeness and get people that are pro-freedom (i.e., against drug prohibition, for marriage equality) and pro-small government. As it sits now, the GOP claims to be pro-small government, but what they really mean is they are pro-legislating morality, but anti-legislating business.

Life, Liberty, & The Pursuit's picture

I’m glad to see that you were pulling for Romney to win as opposed to some libertarians I know who were actively hoping for an Obama victory, which is unthinkable to me. Romney would have at least promoted SOME libertarian principles as president, even if he would not have been as libertarian as we would have liked him to be…Obama however is the antithesis of everything that libertarianism stands for and all libertarians ought to see him as an anathema.

I am not as optimistic as you are about the results of this election but I appreciate your attempt to put a positive spin on things. I suppose the outcome in Colorado regarding marijuana is a positive step but it just seems dwarfed when compared to the magnitude of the defeat that liberty suffered in Obama’s re-election. We will agree to disagree on gay marriage; in my view, every state that legalizes gay marriage is simply further legitimizing state involvement in something that the state has no business being involved in in the first place.

“…stand fast in this liberty wherewith ye have been made free, and…trust no man to be a king over you.” —Mosiah 23:13

antodav's picture

Mourdock’s “offensive view” was that, when bad things happen, it must still be part of God’s plan? Given that he believes in an omnipotent and benevolent God, that seems the obvious interpretation of bad things happening, although not the only possible one.

David Friedman's picture

You know the answer to that - be honest.

Christian mythology has evolved to this point:

1) That all things are gods plan
2) That some things are the result of free will
3) That faith is the ability to believe in things that cannot be shown to exist
4) That the idea that things can exist, though they cannot be shown as such, is the basis of faith

As a result, recovery from cancer is attributed to the power of prayer while failure to recover is attributed to God’s divine will.

Anonymous's picture

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <u> <p> <br> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <span> <img> <object> <embed> <param> <blockquote> <div> <table> <tr> <td> <tbody> <thead>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.

More information about formatting options

 

Twitter


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.