Weighing the Paul Ryan Announcement
This weekend Mitt Romney announced that his running mate would be Congressman Paul Ryan from Wisconsin. Ryan gained a lot of notoriety recently with his better-than-Obama’s budget proposal, which aimed to balance the budget in the next 3 or 4 decades.
It’s a sad day for conservatives when the hero to save them from their budget woes needs 30+ years to balance the budget.
Still, Ryan is the latest non-libertarian making waves about balancing the federal budget, so I would like to believe that Romney’s pick of Ryan is more about sending a message that he is (or that he wants to be) serious about fiscal issues rather than a pick to appease the Tea Party folks who don’t really care for Romney.
I am, however, a bit confused over the Tea Party excitement of Ryan. Sure, Romney could have made a worse choice, but Tea Party leaders are acting like the problems with Romney have vanished now that Ryan is on the ticket.
Let’s remember this is the same Paul Ryan who not only supported TARP but went to the floor of the House to beg his colleagues to do the same. This is the same Paul Ryan who supported the auto bailouts. How do those positions qualify anyone as a fiscal conservative?
On issues of liberty, Ryan supported NDAA (warrantless, indefinite imprisonment of U.S. citizens) and CISPA (similar to SOPA, but not totally the same). And he is also a supporter of the PATRIOT Act, which essentially throws out the Fourth Amendment entirely.
So, weighing all of this, it seems that Romney’s choice is a VP candidate who can appease the base but who really just exemplifies the mess we already have in Washington. Color me unimpressed.