Who are the spending cutters?

We’ve recently noted that House Republicans have largely been a disappointment when it comes to cutting spending. Since taking control of the chamber in January 2011, the national debt has increased by over $1.59 trillion and reasonable amendments to bills that would cut spending have been shot down with many Republicans opting not to keep the promise they made to voters in the fall campaign. There is also talk of bringing back earmarks, an untransparent process that is often corrupt.

So why are the spending cutters in the House? The Club for Growth has tracked the 25 votes on amendments that would cut spending and found the consistent budget hawks in the lower chamber (I’m only posting those that score 100%, for sake of space):

Lawmaker District Party
Score 
Ratio 
Justin Amash MI-3 Republican 100% 25/25
John Campbell CA-48 Republican 100% 25/25
Jeff Flake AZ-6 Republican 100% 25/25
Trent Franks AZ-2 Republican 100% 25/25
Scott Garrett NJ-5 Republican 100% 25/25
Tom Graves GA-9 Republican 100% 25/25
Jeb Hensarling TX-5 Republican 100% 25/25
Tim Huelskamp KS-1 Republican 100% 25/25
Tom McClintock CA-4 Republican 100% 25/25
Mick Mulvaney SC-5 Republican 100% 25/25
Randy Neugebauer TX-19 Republican 100% 25/25
Dana Rohrbacher CA-46 Republican 100% 25/25
Ed Royce CA-40 Republican 100% 25/25
Cliff Stearns FL-6 Republican 100% 25/25
Rob Woodall GA-7 Republican 100% 25/25
Paul Broun GA-10 Republican 100% 25/25
Bill Huizenga NI-2 Republican 100% 25/25
Raul Labrador ID-1 Republican 100% 25/25
Joe Walsh IL-8 Republican 100% 25/25
Ron Paul TX-4 Republican 100% 7/7

Other members of note, including leader, didn’t do so well. For example, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) only voted for seven out of 13 amendments to cut spending, a 54% clip. Rep. Allen West (R-FL), who is still touted as a “Tea Party” guy, voted for 14 out of 25, or 56%.

You can read through the full list here. Find our how your representative voted and let them know if you’re please with their grade.


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.