Johnson Crushes Obama On Gay Marriage Question

President Obama has been playing games over the past week, after Vice President Joe Biden said in an interview that he was “comfortable” with gay marriage and the administration has rushed out to say that he’s not marking a change in government policy or any such thing. There’s even been talk that Biden’s comment was deliberate, an attempt to have one’s cake and eat it too.

Meanwhile, Libertarian Party presidential candidate Gary Johnson had this to say in a press release:

Libertarian nominee for President and former New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson today called for the Obama Administration to “make up its mind” when it comes to supporting marriage equality for all Americans, citing Vice-President Biden’s weekend comments appearing to support gay marriage and White House efforts since to clarify those comments.

Johnson, who supports gay marriage equality, received the Libertarian Party nomination for President Saturday, and will be on the ballot in all 50 states. “The President is playing cruel, cynical politics with a deeply personal issue for many Americans,” said Johnson. “He should quit trying to have it both ways and take a stand.”

In a statement released Wednesday, Johnson said, “Gay marriage equality is not a trick question, and we shouldn’t be getting trick answers from the President of the United States. Gay Americans deserve better than a President who winks and nods and tries to convince them that he will protect their rights, but refuses to emerge from the closet and support one of the most basic rights – the right to  equal access to marriage.  And frankly, even opponents of gay marriage deserve the truth from the White House.  Is the President for it or against it? Right now, the Administration is trying to have it both ways”

I couldn’t agree more. This is especially infuriating considering that Obama is saying his position on gay marriage is “evolving.”

Really? So his position is an amphibian coming out of the primordial waters to finally discover what its like to walk upon dry land? I’m perplexed. Either you’re for gay marriage or you aren’t. I normally take for granted that every situation is multifaceted and not binary, but gay marriage is one of those areas where it’s a bit more cut and dried. (Sure, you have “same sex civil unions,” but let’s be honest here: that’s nothing more than “separate but equal” being applied to gay and lesbian couples. It’s sexual orientation segregation, not a middle ground.)

What really bothers me is the fact that Obama would lose nothing by coming out full throttle for same-sex marriage. The social conservatives aren’t going to vote for him anyways, and it might help him pick up a great many moderates and independents. So then why in the name of truth, liberty, and justice for all is Obama giving us this wishy-washy BS? Why doesn’t he just say “Marriage is none of the government’s business?”

This is why the Tea Party was born. This was why Occupy Wall Street took over America (if only briefly.) The American public is just getting sick of politics. They’re being saturated with the bull that continues to flow from Washington and on our airwaves. What Obama is doing here—playing cruel politics as Johnson puts it so aptly—is just business as usual, the same business that has America frustrated, disgusted, and dismayed. If Obama thinks that that will ensure his victory in November, he’s going to have a rude awakening on that Wednesday.

Gays and lesbians who continue to vote for Democrats are just going to get more of the same on this. It’s battered voter syndrome; they keep coming back, but they still get nothing. Perhaps some will turn to Gary Johnson and the Libertarian Party and put the politics behind.

I hope so. I’m getting rather sick of this having it both ways strategy too.

We have a winner:

“Really? So his position is an amphibian coming out of the primordial waters to finally discover what its like to walk upon dry land?”

Killer line, man. Good write-up…

-MM

mmccart's picture

Thanks! Now I know which line to go with when I market it.

jdkolassa's picture

Watch out, advocates of gay rights. Obama made similar positive statements about medical marijuana during his last campaign. Then after he was elected he sent the DOJ after the medical marijuana providers even more than Bush had done. It’s better to support a real, clear, strong supporter of gay marriage — Gary Johnson, the Libertarian candidate. Even if Johnson loses, votes for him will send a clear message to the other two parties.

Anonymous's picture

We should celebrate President Obama for finally supporting something that Gary Johnson has believed in all along. :P

Anonymous's picture

My question is: Does society have a right to say what marriage is?

Prince Valiant's picture

Personally, I’d say no.

jdkolassa's picture

Obama on his evolution on this matter contained in his latest work Origin of the Specious

Anonymous's picture

If “Marriage is none of the Government’s business” then what’s all the fuss about?

Anonymous 1's picture

Maybe because the government is MAKING it its business?

jdkolassa's picture

I was surfing net and fortunately came across this site and found very interesting stuff here. Its really fun to read. I enjoyed a lot. Thanks for sharing this wonderful information.
3 free credit reports

Anonymous's picture

Gary is a hero to the gay community! All those things he didn’t do to advance the cause of gay civil rights when he was actually in office! All those things he never said about his position supporting gay marriage when he was a Republican POTUS candidate only 6 months or so ago! The courageous stand on gay rights he didn’t take when he addressed CPAC a year ago! What a stand-up dude he is! A man of true conviction! Yipee! He pwned Obama on this one! ::::::snicker::::::

btw at the end of Gary’s CPAC speech he proclaimed that (paraphrasing) “only the GOP can fix America’s troubles and the party must grow!” (and then he quit that party less than a year later). Gary Johnson! Again, a man of true convictions!!!! w00t!!!!!

danielhart's picture

He didn’t mention his position in the GOP debates because they didn’t ask him. But his position then was as it is now, and he made no effort to conceal it:

http://www.advocate.com/news/daily-news/2011/09/21/boost-gay-rights-gary…

He also made no effort to conceal his pro-life stance, unpopular as it may have been within the GOP.

Unlike Obama and Romney, he doesn’t play games.

Ben's picture

Seriously, to the OP Jeremy - can you list anything of substance that Gary Johnson actually did to advance the cause of gay civil rights before he became the Libertarian nominee 5 months ago?

Please show the things he did when he was actually in office, and compare them to the things Obama has done as the most active pro-gay rights administration in history.

I am glad Gary supports gay civil rights, but screw his sanctimony on this issue is what I am saying. Fair enough?

danielhart's picture

Gay marriage was not as much of an issue back when Johnson was governor. Plus keep in mind that he advocates a federal standard, something beyond the realm of a governor. Same holds for “don’t ask, don’t tell” but he was nonetheless an outspoken opponent of it.

Plus remember that the executive branch can’t do it alone. Bills start in the legislature, and Johnson may have floated the issue by word-of-mouth and found he wouldn’t have the votes.

Anyway if you think you can trust Obama or Romney as far as you could throw them I’d suggest you think again.

Ben's picture

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <u> <p> <br> <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <pre> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <span> <img> <object> <embed> <param> <blockquote> <div> <table> <tr> <td> <tbody> <thead>
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • SmartyPants will translate ASCII punctuation characters into “smart” typographic punctuation HTML entities.

More information about formatting options

 

Twitter


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.