The Complicated World of Bigotry

In the greater Seattle suburb of Kirkland, a very quaint and beautiful area where I would love to live someday, there is a grade-A @$$hole who has led a fevered vendetta against gay rights. He’s the pastor of Antioch Bible Church (where he’s been for over two decades) and has not only been a firm opponent of gay marriage, but of anti-discrimination legislation and domestic partnerships. He is arguably to the right of many gay marriage opponents from far more conservative areas of the country.

It’s worth noting that the pastor in question, Ken Hutcherson, is black. Whatever solidarity he is supposed to have as an ethnic minority for a sexual minority is apparently quite lost on him. Ken Hutcherson’s existence shouldn’t be shocking to those with life experience outside of textbook indoctrination. I’ve met many racists and homophobes, some white, some Hispanic, some Asian, and they all come in many different colors, shapes and sizes. It’s nearly a waste of time to confront them about it. Bigotry is not something people like to admit, and if you mention it they tend to act like they’ve been unfairly attacked.

Now that the high emotion surrounding the passage of the health care bill is in the past, it is very important to remember this. Racism and xenophobia is rampant in the culturally homogenous society of Japan, where even those of Japanese ancestry who were born elsewhere have difficulty being accepted. I’ve personally heard very disparaging remarks towards blacks from Hispanics, heard bigoted comments towards blacks from Indians, heard whites say horrible generalizations about black people and vice versa. Racism is not a homogenous factor of one particular ethnic or political group; it’s the result of the natural tribal instinct that we share with our primate cousins.

The Federal Student Loan Takeover: Making A Bad Situation Worse

Though not nearly as well-publicized as health care reform, the federal government’s takeover of the student loan industry, which became law earlier this week, promises to have far-reaching economic implications. And, like health care reform, we’re only now discovering what the government has done to us.

The Cato Institute’s Neal McCluskey, for example, points out that the law essentially takes a bad situation and makes it much worse:

First, the leeches have hardly been burned off. Sallie Mae and a few other now-former lenders have been promised big federal contracts to service loans under the new regime, so don’t worry — they’ll still get theirs.

Second, though this isn’t a federal takeover of anything close to a truly private market, it is marginally worse, from a free-market perspective, than the status quo ante. At least until the recent credit crunch, firms in the guaranteed-lending program got their money through capital markets, keeping at least a small amount of discipline about whether students won the capital that everyone was competing for. Now students will just take their dough from the Treasury.

(…)

Third, the president’s goal of having a greater percentage of college graduates than any other nation in the world by 2020 — which this expansion of aid is supposed to help accomplish — is economically dubious. We already have far more four-year degree holders than we have jobs for them — to say nothing of whether we have the right four-year degrees for the jobs — and the greatest numerical growth in employment in the coming decade is supposed to be primarily in jobs requiring only on-the-job training. So what we are heading for if the president gets his profusion of sheepskins is not a stronger economy, but a much less efficient one.

California’s Fiscal Irony

Life is poetic and ironic.

The California state government has long been fiscally irresponsible, catering to the teachers and prison guards unions. If some responsibility had been established, California wouldn’t now be wrestling with a $6 billion deficit.

Funding the states’ prisons were no small part of the creation of a fiscal nightmare. According to SFGate, 2012-13 has a projected $15.4 billion being allocated to prisons. Drug possession likely played no small part in the incarceration rate, with California NORML recording 74,119 arrests for marijuana in 2007 alone. Now with a deficit caused by excessive prison funding, the state is now facing the possible decriminalization of marijuana.

Irony!

 

Why Does Change Taste So Bitter?

So this is what change tastes like…pretty much the same as what we were being fed before, except more bitter and by force; like castor oil, except it makes us worse, not better.

At nearly 11PM on Sunday, March 21, 2010, the House passed the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the culmination of generations worth of liberal ideological dreams, a year of contentious debate, and months worth of open bribery, extortion, arm-twisting, vote-buying and the use of arcane parliamentary tactics such as reconciliation and “deem-and-pass”, all in order to pass a bill that no one had a clue would end up looking like when it was signed. Why? Because the bill that was signed is not the one that will be implemented. That comes with the passage of the Senate amendments to make the House Democrats happy.

Why would so much time and effort be put into passing a bill that became more unpopular the longer it was in the public eye? Quite simply, because it is not about health care, it is about power. Power of 1/6th of the American economy, which conveys an enormous amount of influence for those charged with allocating those resources and privileges, and power over the health (and therefore life and death) decisions of over 300 million people.

President Barack Obama and Speaker Nancy Pelosi both came into power campaigning on a promise to end the Republican “culture of corruption” in Washington. Instead they doubled down. They promised us the most ethical and transparent Congress and administration in history. They promised debates on major legislation would be broadcast on C-SPAN, and that everything would be out in the open. They promised us a new way of doing business in Washington. We have a new way, alright…the Chicago way. Al Capone would be proud.

GOP Presidential Primary Will Be Ugly

GOPWhile talking politics with a mentor last night, it dawned on me just how ugly the Presidential primary will be. This also makes me question whether there is any candidate that will actually be able to build enough support to overthrow Obama.

1) There is an increasing divide in the Republican Party

Ron Paul might have been a small player in the last primary, but his support has increased over the past two years. Anyone who knows Paul supporters knows that they are extremely passionate about their views and oftentimes find many problems with mainstream (or neo-conservative) Republicans. Many of these supporters will have a hard time voting for a Republican candidate if they have views that are radically different than Paul.

This divide has shown up recently in the differing reactions to the CPAC straw poll (which Paul won) as well as many neo-conservatives lashing out against the non-interventionist foreign policy of Paul.

2) Romneycare

Unfortunately for Mitt Romney, one of the early front-runners for the GOP nomination, health care will be a much bigger issue than it has been in the past. The more conservative candidate in primaries has the upper hand, as can be seen with Marco Rubio in Florida and Rand Paul in Kentucky. Romney may come off as the strongest leader but his lack of consistent conservative credentials will cause him a lot of trouble in the upcoming primary.

3) Sarah Palin: love or hate?

Obama Opens Coastal Waters To Drilling

There’s often alot of talk about energy independence. Obama’s most recent move is what energy independence looks like in the real world, and not the theoretical land of environmental science classes:

(CNN) — President Obama unveiled plans Wednesday to open large swaths of U.S. coastal waters in the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico to oil and natural gas drilling — a move likely to please the energy industry but upset the administration’s environmentalist supporters.

The administration plan includes lifting a 20-year ban on drilling off the Virginia coastline, while putting the clamps on sites that had been approved off the southwest coast of Alaska.

The plan authorizes the Interior Department to conduct seismic surveys off the south- and mid-Atlantic coasts to “determine the quantity and location of potential oil and gas resources to support energy planning,” according to a statement from a White House official.

 

Guns in DC

Three people were killed and six wounded after a drive-by shooting occured in Southeast Washington DC this week .

The tragedy unfolded in a town where it is ridiculously difficult to legally purchase a gun. DC has some of the strictest anti-gun ownership laws in the nation. For many District residents who want to own a gun, the burdens aren’t worth the time and cost. So they get them illegally. (Such are the consequences many draconian laws. If you’re willing to  break the law, you can have a gun.)

So you can imagine why one might find today’s Washington Post editorial cartoon troubling and perplexing:Gun Cartoon

In a city in which the Second Amendment is barely recognized as a right, it is difficult to blame the Second Amendment for gun-related deaths. It is dissapointing (but not surprising) to see that Tom Toles is unable to grasp that.

Dissent is the highest form of patriotism (unless you’re in power, then it’s treason and terrorism)

The media conveniently forgot that distrust in with the government isn’t new. While they are now slamming tea party protesters and others speaking out against President Barack Obama and his policies, they disregard the protests during George W. Bush’s presidency.

It was once your right to speak out against the government. Now you can’t do it without being called a “hater” or “unpatriotic” or “racist.” My how things change once the other side is in power.

There was a lot to protest, so I’m not taking up for Bush. I’m just pointing out that protesters were just as vitriolic then as they are now, as you can see in this video.

H/T: QandO (and just about every friend on Facebook)

Cartoon of the Day: Santa Claus and Social Security

I lifted this from Brett Bittner’s Twitter feed. Sadly, this cartoon is a reality for most Americans.

Socialist Insecurity

Explaining the broken window fallacy

Do natural disasters, earthquakes or wars stimulate an economy and create growth? Did World War II get the United States out of the Great Depression? In this video, the Atlas Economic Research Foundation’s Bastiat Legacy Project, using Frédéric Bastiat’s parable of the broken window, explains the fallacy of the argument.

 
 

Twitter


The views and opinions expressed by individual authors are not necessarily those of other authors, advertisers, developers or editors at United Liberty.