Bob Barr Unphased: The Washington Times

May 11th, 2008 Posted in General | No Comments »

The Washington times just recently released a great article on Bob Barr. Here it is:

Former Rep. Bob Barr says a number of Republicans have been trying to persuade him not to run for president on the Libertarian Party ticket, but none has given him a convincing reason.

…Mr. Barr says even people who have tried to dissuade him understand why he thinks it important to raise issues from what he calls a “genuinely conservative” perspective and to offer alternatives to the positions of the two major-party candidates.

“In the month since we formed our exploratory committee, not a single Republican who has spoken with me to try and convince me not to seek the Libertarian nomination has disagreed with my reasons for considering a run,” Mr. Barr told The Times today in an e-mail exchange before leaving London on a flight to Atlanta.

Most Republicans who asked him not to run “also said they understand why I’d run and why John McCain is not conservative and will not seriously tackle the growth in government power and spending,” he said. “Some said they would vote for me if I ran, but for the sake of the Republican Party, they would prefer I didn’t.”

Mr. Barr will be speaking tomorrow at the National Press Club, I am personally going to be attending - should be very interesting to see his final decision.

Read the full article here

Update on McCain’s FEC woes

May 9th, 2008 Posted in Candidates, News | No Comments »

Senator McCain’s possible FEC violations were previously blogged about here- McCain snared in his own FEC trap?

The New York Times, reports that it appears President Bush may be attempting to come to McCain’s rescue by announcing three nominees for the FEC agency. If they are confirmed, this would give the commission the quorum they need to vote and decide whether McCain has been released from the matching funds program or not.

What makes it interesting is that President Bush has also decided to not renominate the current FEC chair, David Mason, who has questioned McCain’s right to withdraw from the matching funds program.

Is this a blatant attempt by the President to help McCain win, ensuring what would amount to a 3rd term for Bush’s presidency?

A Message from William Lawson

May 9th, 2008 Posted in General | No Comments »

This video perfectly illustrates why he won his election with such a large margin. Looking forward to a hard fought win in November!!

Bob Barr to Hold Major Press Conference

May 8th, 2008 Posted in Blog, Bob Barr, Candidates | No Comments »

I just spoke with my source from the Bob Barr 08 campaign, and they say it is highly likely Bob will discuss the upcoming Convention and his potential candidacy on Monday. Looks like Mr. Barr will be making his final decision over the weekend while he enjoys his time in Europe after the recent debate. Looking forward to an official campaign here!!

Personally, I don’t think that it hurt him all that much by waiting, he obviously has a high chance of winning the nomination.  That means a serious impact on ones life - especially if you are running to win, which it seems a few of these candidates aren’t taking seriously. Through my work with the Ron Paul campaign, I certainly saw what even a few months of “campaign time” can do to ones ‘regular’ work & family life.

William Lawson GOP Nominee for Congress!

May 6th, 2008 Posted in General | 1 Comment »

Congratulations to Dr. Lawson! Lets all donate $5 dollars to his campaign to jump start them into the General Election. Lets also remember all of the people that have worked so hard and volunteered their time to help Dr. Lawson have such a strong showing in NC. With more money, Dr. Law will be able to hire these dedicated people as full time staff to make our General Election dreams come true.

We must remember that this is not just a fight for North Carolinians! Our country would benefit enormously from having 2 good Doctors on the House Floor - fighting for our rights - fighting for people who do not even realize they are being fought for.

The Price is Wrong folks!!! Congratulations again to William Lawson!

Congratulations Dr. Law!

“Ron Paul Jr.” Grasps Early Lead

May 6th, 2008 Posted in General | 2 Comments »

Our very own William “BJ” Lawson, dubbed “Ron Paul Jr.” by his opponent appears to have a 2.5 to 1 lead over Augustus Cho in early polling. This might be early, but he has held this lead since the polls have begun reporting. We at United Liberty want to congratulate Mr. Lawson on a well fought Primary and wish him the best as he begins his campaign against the incumbent, David Price. We will keep you posted!

Click image for current results

Early Primary Reporting

Please visit his website and continue to show your support by donating. He is going to need our contribution to take on David Price. Mr. Lawson has shown he is a winner. What will you do to have another Ron Paul in office?!!

http://www.lawsonforcongress.com

UPDATE: With half of the precincts reporting, Mr. Lawson has a commanding lead over Augustus Cho bringing in over 20k votes while he struggles to breach 10k. Go Voters Go!!! RESULTS>

Housing Bailout Cheats the Smart Poor

May 5th, 2008 Posted in General | No Comments »

My fiance and I save our money diligently, and because we live in California, we have opted to not buy a house until we are very ready. “Ready” meaning we have close to 1/3rd of the cash on hand to help us get a low monthly payment that will last throughout the mortgage.

There are millions of people who make the choice to rent throughout America, a safe choice where they can minimize their financial risk and leverage a certain portion of constant savings to make an eventual investment they can be proud of, and secure in.

These hard working, financially responsible American’s are now being told they went about it the wrong way. The Nanny State is here to bail you out.

McBush is out of touch

May 5th, 2008 Posted in Candidates, General, Ron Paul, Video | No Comments »

McCain says “Mission Accomplished”

May 5th, 2008 Posted in Candidates, General, Video | No Comments »

Conservative Landslide in Great Britain

May 3rd, 2008 Posted in General | 2 Comments »

by John Killian

Waking from sleep, the Conservative Party dominated municipal elections in England and Wales in the elections held Thursday, May 1. Labour Prime Minister Gordon Brown is forced to retreat with some British pundits expecting Brown to step down as Prime Minister and leader of the Labour Party. The Labour Party has held dominance in the United Kingdom since Tony Blair became Prime Minister in 1997.
The Conservative Party rise has come under the dynamic leadership of Tory leader David Cameron. Cameron is an idea man, a powerful speaker with a charismatic presence. Most importantly, Cameron communicated conservative ideals after the pattern of Newt Gingrich or Ronald Reagan. In fact, the Conservative landslide in England and Wales (Scotland and Northern Ireland have municipal elections on a separate occasion), reminded me of a time when Republicans talked about ideas, communicated to the average citizen, and swept elections, as when Reagan was elected in 1980 or when Newt Gingrich led in the GOP sweep of 1994.
The scope of the conservative landslide was huge:
* Conservatives netted a gain of 256 councilors and won control of an additional twelve councils.
* In a multi-party system, Conservatives won 44% of the national vote. Labour, which had been dominant, sunk to 24%, actually falling behind the Liberal Democratic Party who scored 25% of the national vote.
* Conservatives gained ground in traditional Labour controlled areas, including Wales, where the Conservative Party has had almost no representation.
* Conservatives elected Boris Johnson as the first-ever Conservative Mayor of London, the UK’s largest city.
Conservatives won by communicating to the average Britisher that conservative principles are better for them. David Cameron appealed to the patriotism of Britishers with his challenge to Gordon Brown and the Labour Party for their votes in Parliament to ratify the European Union Treaty, without a vote of the people. This highly unpopular move would surrender national rights to an international body.
David Cameron and the Conservative Party made the case for more privitization and less government interference in the economy of Great Britain. While the UK is farther down the pike toward socialism than the United States, I am glad to see at least some move toward retreat from a statist economy.
As a lover of Northern Ireland and a supporter of British Unionism, what are the implications for sustaining the Union?
1) The Wales nationalist party, Plaid Cmyru lost ground in Wales. This is a good omen for Unionism in Wales.
2) A Labour defeat is good for Unionism in Northern Ireland for two reasons. First, the Labour Party has refused to organize in Northern Ireland, due to the sympathy with Irish nationalists. Secondly, Gordon Brown recently wrote an article in the London Telegraph making the case for Unionism in Wales, Scotland, and England. Never once did he mention Northern Ireland. Some pundits expect that the Labour government has no plans to defend the Union in the context of Northern Ireland.
What are the implications for the United States?
Actually, both Brown and Cameron are friends with the United States. I cannot help but take note that Gordon Brown recently met with Senator Obama, Senator Clinton, and Senator McCain. David Cameron of the Conservative Party met only with Senator John McCain. The Conservative Party, under Margaret Thatcher, was close to the Reagan Administration.
American Republicans should learn from this Conservative victory.

1.) Republicans have lost their distinction as the party of smaller government. Yet, standing against big government swept the country in 1980 with Reagan and 1994 with the leadership of Newt Gingrich. Even in statist England and Wales, talk about limiited government struck a chord with voters.
2.) Britishers are much more accustomed toward internationalist thinking than Americans. Yet, Britishers are alarmed that their nation will be subservient to the control of the European Union. Polls overwhelmingly display that Americans are wary of NAFTA, GATT, the North American Union, and the NAFTA highway. People define themselves with national identity and the push for internationalism will sink any American political party who will not assure voters that they will be defended as Americans.
Congratulations to the Conservative Party of the United Kingdom. My hope is that the Conservatives will win the next Parliamentary elections and that we will catch a glimpse of the traditions of Maggie Thatcher with David Cameron as Prime Minister.